Another letter

Dear Richard,

While I thank you for taking the time to send me the Mayor's view, I must point out that the Mayor's stance in the Avenue du Parc renaming hasn't changed, in spite of public outcry, and therefore doesn't need to be repeated. Your letter failed completely to convince me that the Mayor is correct in this matter.

Furthermore, I was deeply offended by your implication that only so-called "neo-Montrealers" will be affected by the change. In particular, the term "neo-Montrealer" seems to apply to people whose families have lived in Montreal for several generations and I feel this is unjustified. I would like to know how long the Mayor thinks a family needs to live in the city before they can call it home? Your letter also gave me the impression that, because the Mayor feels that the majority of the opposition to the renaming is coming from "neo-Montrealers," the public opposition is less valid. Please remind him that he was elected to serve all Montrealers and, therefore, the view of all Montrealers, no matter how long they have lived here, should be considered equally.

Regardless, the implication that only "neo-Montrealers" will be affected by the change is completely incorrect. If you have been following the debate in the newspapers, you should be aware that many longtime Montrealers are against the proposed name change.

Additionally, I feel your statement about consultation is inaccurate. The consultation the people of Montreal are demanding is public consultation. Consulting the Municipal Council and the Commission de toponymie du Québec does not constitute public consultation.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Susan McVety